COVID-19: Are There Ethical Issues with Jabs or Mandates?
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons published an article on the ethics of vaccine mandates, citing our letter to Colleges and Universities.
Young v. Hawaii
CLDEF joined other pro-gun parties to urge the U.S. Supreme Court to review the virtual total ban on carrying firearms in the State of Hawaii. We urge the Court to overturn the two-step test used in many Second Amendment challenges.
Letter to Virginia Private and Public Colleges & Universities Demanding Revocation of Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccine Requirement
The Center for Medical Freedom, a project of CLDEF, is demanding that Virginia colleges and universities revoke their mandate that students receive dangerous COVID-19 vaccines before returning to school in the fall.
Word letter sent to Public Colleges is here.
WordPerfect letter sent to Public Colleges is here.
PDF letter sent to Public Colleges is here.
Word letter sent to Private Colleges is here.
WordPerfect letter sent to Private Colleges is here.
PDF letter sent to Private Colleges is here.
CORRECTION. The Section I.D. heading states “The VAERS System Now Shows Tremendous Death and Illness from the Disease.” The word “Disease” should have been “Vaccines.”
A second letter was sent to Virginia public colleges and universities asking them to revoke their COVID-19 vaccine mandate and making FOIA requests for important documents (July 6, 2021).
Second Word letter sent to Virginia public colleges is here.
Second WordPerfect letter sent to Virginia public colleges is here.
Second PDF letter sent to Virginia public colleges is here.
A second letter was sent to Virginia private colleges and universities asking them to revoke their COVID-19 vaccine mandate (July 9, 2021).
Second Word letter sent to Virginia private colleges is here.
Second WordPerfect letter sent to Virginia private colleges is here.
Second PDF letter sent to Virginia private colleges is here.
Duncan v. Bonta
Today, CLDEF joined Gun Owners of America, Inc., and others in filing an amicus brief attacking the constitutionality of a California ban on standard capacity magazines, which the California law mislabels as “Large Capacity Magazines.” The District Court and Ninth Circuit panel both ruled for that the laws were unconstitutional, and the Ninth Circuit granted rehearing en banc. Our brief defends the decision reached by the courts below, but urges the Ninth Circuit to reject its atextual “two-step” test and simply apply the “text, history, and tradition” of the Second Amendment to reach a decision.